Poop Clicker

Poop Clicker

Not enough ratings
Poop Clicker Efficiency Calculator
By 돌고래
This guide suggests the most efficient item purchase methods for more effective achievement completion in Poop Clicker.
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Calculator Link and Usage Instructions


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17PhvyE5mNNY_A67Aoqn7MP3rIEv46KROzP9cHCZrTko/edit?usp=sharing

1. This calculator suggests the most efficient way to purchase items based on the current purchase cost and rewards.

2. This calculator does not take upgrade costs and efficiencies into account, so please check the Efficiency and upgrade accordingly.

3. This calculator does not calculate the purchase cost and efficiency of Specials (as they are very low).

4. Feel free to make a copy of this file and use it as you wish.

5. Do not modify the dark gray areas as they contain formulas or fixed values. (If additional items are added in the future, please update the Base Income accordingly.)

6. If you purchase an item for the first time, check the Unlock box.

7. Enter the number of upgrades for the item in the Upgrade Count.

8. Enter the current purchase cost of the item in the Current Cost.

9. Keep in mind that the unit of the current purchase cost varies between K, M, and B (refer to the calculator below).
2 Comments
돌고래  [author] 11 Aug @ 3:48am 
@ARecoveringCynic

First, thank you for your feedback. I recommend using it as follows

Based on the growth of the current cost, I think this will happen when K and B coexist, so in this case, I would enter a number based on K.

For example, when most items cost a few K, the expensive items will already be a few B. In that case, you would enter the number of B items in K multiplied by 1,000.

So if an item costs 1.04B, you'd enter 1040, and so on. This keeps the number of numbers you need to enter clean.
ARecoveringCynic 10 Aug @ 4:45pm 
When putting in the current purchase cost, do I just put 100 if the cost is 100 Billion? Putting B in that column breaks the formula, and typing out the value itself makes the table really ugly