For each case, I'll give a chronoligcal inventory of all evidence picked up and deduction solutions. I've spoilered out the answer and provided hints in certain situations, but don't scroll too far down or you'll get spoiled.
There are five optional conclusions: 1 for the first three cases and 2 for the forth. The fifth case has only one answer. The Truth ending is the real conclusion for the case and you need the information from them to start the fifth case, while the non truth endings end the case without revealing the full truth. The branching point between these endings is telegraphed with a prompt for you to save your game.
If you want to get straight to the split point, CTRL-F for Branching Point
There are side stories that can be played at any time, but Side Story 1 spoils the game up to Case 3 and Side Story is an epilogue. There are no deductions in either.

• The fifth case can be started at any time, but the only way to truly begin is to correctly answer who committed the murder for the first four cases. In other words, you need to get the Truth ending for the first four cases (or read this guide, but that’s no fun) to start.
  
• Many questions have multiple valid answers. For example, in one point in case 2, you’re asked to explain why a suspect could not have reported an animal into a room. His bureau file’s explanation that he can’t move anything over 60 kg is a valid answer, but a witness statement specifying that the animal weighs above 100 kg is also a valid answer. For the purposes of this guide, I will only be providing one answer per question
  
• You can tell when you’re on the wrong path, as you don’t get to do a Hexalogic, the Chapter abruptly jumps to its comedy scene, and Notrick specifically notes that something isn’t right. The game will allow you to jump back to the divergence point. For efficency's sake, you'll want to do the non truth endings first
  
• If you're struggling to figure out what you have to argue in a deduction, reread the log or see what the text says when you answer incorrectly
  
• Some deductions will ask for only one piece of evidence and others need two
  
• When you present evidence, you need to present a specific part of a document. When you're trying to figure out a puzzle, think "What part of this document proves this point?"

When the game starts, you can skip the prologue, which will skip the first five deductions and take you to the first memory survey


We start with two pieces of evidence: Notrick's Employee Badge and the Inv. Directors badge

Deduction 1: What’s the name of the agency?

• Evidence 1:Inv. Directors Letter
  
• Answer: The salutation: Sincerely, the Pheno-mana Bureau

New Evidence: Bureau Floor Plan

Deduction 2: How can we find the location of the Mana Affairs Division on the map

• Evidence 1: Bureau Floor Plan
  
• Evidence 2: Notrick’s Employee Badge
  
• AnswerNA-01 on the badge with the NA-01 on the upper left room on the map

New Evidence: Bureau File - Geller

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Geller

Deduction 3: Using Thena’s power, what is the lie in Geller’s statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Geller
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Geller
  
• Answer: Statement 2 “I came to see him at nine o’clock” and the corresponding Abnormal Heartbeat 2

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Geller 2
New Evidence: Trace Photo - Crime Scene

Deduction 4: What document contradicts the trace?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Crime Scene
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Geller 2
  
• Answer: Footprints - Geller at 19:30 (7 PM) and Statement 6( “I had no other reason to visit the scene that day!”)

Deduction 5: What’s the issue with Thena’s statement on the transcript?

• Evidence 1 - Transcript
  
• Evidence 2 - Bureau File - Geller
  
• Answer: Oppose Thena’s comment (“obviously she’s got to get close to whack him on the head!”) with Range (Max - Two meters)

Memory Survey

• Bookcase on left
  
• Melted sculpture
  
• Broken flower pot
  
• Stain on rug
  
• Feather on desk
  
• Desk chair
  
• Tea cup on desk
  
• Dart board on wall

New Evidence: Memory Survey - Crime Scene
This is not added to the collection, but note that there is a bloodstain on the ceiling of the crime scene that is five meters high and has no obvious explanation as to how it got there (the victim was killed with one blow, so it’s not a backswing from an already bloody weapon)

New Evidence: Bureau File - Vernon

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Vernon

Deduction 1: What is the issue with Vernon’s statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Vernon
  
• Evidence 2: Memory Survey - Crime Survey
  
• Answer: Connect statement 7 “There was no hard feelings ” with Grotesque Statue - Melted by extreme heat

Something to note: the boss’s ability is to jump real high

New Evidence: Witness Statement 2 - Geller
New Evidence: Bureau File - Aston

Deduction 2: What is the issue with Thena’s hypothesis, that Ashton opened the door?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Aston
  
• Answer: Oppose Thena’s comment “she could just have lied about not opening the door” with Statement 2 (she did not open the door)

Deduction 3: How did she know he was sleeping?
Hint: If she couldn’t have seen the victim, what other sense could have communicated that he was asleep?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Crime Scene
  
• Answer: Chair - “snoring heard in memory”

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Aston 2
Bureau File - Houdin

Deduction 4: What happened between the victim and Geller at 7:30 PM?
Hint:

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Aston 2
  
• Answer: Statement 7 - “He once tried to put hands on me once. Fortunately, he stopped right before hitting me.”

Deduction 5: Why did the victim dislike Geller?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Aston 2
  
• Answer: Statement 2, “The ringleader often said of Yulia, ‘I was tricked into hiring that girl’”

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Geller 3
New Evidence: Trump Tower Poster
New Evidence: Trace Photo - Crime Scene Exterior

Deduction 6: Was the victim dead by the time Vernon arrived at the scene?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Crime Scene
  
• Answer: Chair - Snoring ceased after a shock

Deduction 7: Why couldn’t have Geller killed the victim from a distance with her power?

• Evidence 1: Aston Statement 2
  
• Answer: Statement 3 “Geller could make things float, but only those she could reach out and touch.”

Deduction 8: What skill could make a murder weapon?
Hint: What power could create a solid blunt object?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Aston
  
• Answer: Skill - Chain Ice Formation

Deduction 9: What could have melted the ice?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Vernon
  
• Answer: Skill - Ignition

Deduction 10: Is there a problem with the ice weapon theory?
Hint: Is there a limit to Vernon and Aston’s powers that would make this unfeasible?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Aston
  
• Evidence 2: Memory Photo - Crime Scene
  
• Answer: Aston’s Catalyst (must use purified water) and Rug (floor was covered in warm tea)

Hint: If we look at the transcript, we have two conflicting ideas. There’s either a Staffer who’s powers we have not seriously thought about who could have caused the victim’s death or there’s a way to enter the crime scene without leaving footsteps?
Did we ever figure out what the deal is with those square impressions?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Bureau File - Houdin
  
• Answer: Oppose Redfins (no weapon) with Houdin’s name (a staffer we haven't considered yet)

Deduction 1A: Was it really a suicide?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Bureau File - Houdin
  
• Answer: Oppose Bryan("Without leaving behind a weapon") with Houdin’s Skill (high velocity object population)

Deduction 2A: What was fired upwards?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Aston 2
  
• Answer: Statement 4, “soaring through the air”

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Circus Poster
  
• Answer: Oppose Bryan (killer couldn't have flown in) and Geller the Jumping Jester

Deduction 1B: Leaping leftovers? What’s the trace proof she entered the room?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Crime Scene,
  
• Answer: Square Shaped Impressions

Hexalogic
Hint: We assumed Geller couldn't have been done it due to the limits of her skill, then what would happen if her skill functioned differently than we thought?

1. Poster: the jumping jester
   
2. Trace photo - square shaped impression
   
3. Trace photo - square shaped impression
   
4. Transcript: Thena’s comment “fool us about their skills”
   
5. Witness Statement - Geller - Statement 5 “I was unable to manipulate far items like he hoped”
   
6. Witness Statement - Aston - Statement 3 “Geller can make things float, but only those close enough to reach out and touch “

Deduction 2B: What was the weapon? Whatever it is, it's at least 20 kg.

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Geller
  
• Answer: Extra Note 1: maximum object weight - 20 kg

Deduction 3B: How did she get high enough?

• Evidence 1: Circus Poster
  
• Answer: Geller Description - Jumping Jester

New Evidence: Bureau File - Beck
New Evidence: Witness Statement - Beck

Deduction 1: Which statement in Beck’s testimony is the lie?

• Evidence: Witness Statement - Beck
  
• Answer: Statement 2 “right when I heard the sound” and Abnormal Heartbeat 2

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Hawes
New Evidence: Bureau File - Hawes
New Evidence: Blueprint of the Woods Facility
New Evidence: Bureau file - Moko
New Evidence: Witness Statement - Moko

Deduction 2: Why is the building divided into two wings, one for mammals and one for reptiles?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Hawes
  
• Answer: Catalyst - Reptiles

Deduction 3: What was the murder weapon mentioned in the witness statement?

• Evidence 1:Witness Statement - Moko 1
  
• Answer: Statement 1, “the creechers eat anything in front of them”

New Evidence: Trace Photo - Mammal Wing

Memory Survey - Mammal Wing

• Large cage
  
• Small cage
  
• Step ladder
  
• Off-limits door
  
• Drain

New Evidence: Mammal Wing - Memory Survey

Piece of information to note - Hawes sits on the stepladder and infrequently uses Lounge 1

Clue Time - Lounge 2

• Door
  
• Table
  
• Trace on floor
  
• Cabinet

New Evidence: Trace Photo - Lounge 2

Memory Survey - Lounge 1

• Door
  
• Photo
  
• Book
  
• Chair

New Evidence - Memory Survey - Lounge 1

Deduction 4: Why couldn’t Beck have used his skill to commit the murder?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Beck
  
• Answer: Maximum Object Weight - 60 kg

Deduction 5: What’s the problem with the transcript?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Bureau File - Hawes
  
• Answer: Oppose Thena’s “both of them could have moved their creatures to the crime scene” with Range - 4 meters

Deduction 6: Do we have evidence that Hawes was in the mammal wing at noon?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Mammal Wing
  
• Answer: Stepladder - Sitting Trace

Witness Statement - Moko 2

Deduction 7: What’s the contradiction in her statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Moko 2
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Lounge 2
  
• Answer: Statement 4, “I didn’t step outside until around 12:20” and Fingerprints - Moko at 12:05

Deduction 8: What’s the problem with her claim that the picture is missing from the lounge?

• Evidence 1: Memory Photo - Lounge Number 1
  
• Answer: Picture - Not Moved

Deduction 9: How could a person be moved between rooms without them realizing it?

• Evidence 1: Bureau file - Beck
  
• Answer: Skill - Coordinate Based Object Transmission

Deduction 10: Why couldn’t have Moko left lounge 2 the normal way, through the door?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Lounge Number 2
  
• Answer: Door Handle “Moko did not touch the door handle”

Deduction 11: What effect would Moko being moved from Lounge 1 to Lounge 2 have on her actions?

• Evidence:Witness Statement - Moko 2
  
• Answer: Statement 3 “I’m sure I sent it to eat in the room to my left looking in”

Deduction 12: What location could have Beck used to be in range of Moko, if not his office?

• Evidence 1: Woods Floor Plan
  
• Answer: The drainage pipes

Hint: We have a killer dead to rights. Is it time to investigate further or call it a day?

• Evidence 1:Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Memory Survey - Mammal Wing
  
• Answer: Oppose Thena “couldn’t have someone knocked him out” with “Vent - Beck opened the vent”

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Memory Survey - Mammal Wing
  
• Answer: Oppose Redfins (nothing left to investigate) with Staff Only Door

Memory Survey - Basement
A quick note about this one is that there’s only one important thing to inspect, the door, which will instantly end the survey and send you to your next deduction
New Evidence: Trace Photo - Basement

Deduction 13: What is the contradiction between Hawes being in the mammal wing at the time of the murder and the new trace photo?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Basement
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Mammal Wing
  
• Answer: Four Rectangular Impressions and Stepladder- Trace of Someone Sitting

New Evidence - Witness Statement - Hawes 2

Deduction 14: What’s the lie in his statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Hawes 2
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Hawes 2
  
• Answer: Statement 7 “that’s the only reason I was down there” and the corresponding Abnormal Heartbeat 7

What was Hawes doing in the underground?
Hint: It was never once said that the power to control mammals was limited to creechers

1. Bureau file - Hawes - Catalyst - Mammals
   
2. Witness statement - Hawes - forth statement, “humans are no different than mammals”
   
3. Floor plan - drainage pipes
   
4. Witness statement - Beck “I could clearly remember being in my lab, but then suddenly I was somewhere else!”
   
5. Track Photo - Four rectangular impressions
   
6. Witness statement - Moko - “the skill Hawes has is similar to mine. But for some reason, his threat level is higher than mine”

Memory Survey - Survey Exterior

• Shed door
  
• Shed floor
  
• Bunched up clothing on ground
  
• Protective clothing on body

New Evidence: Trace Photo - Survey Exterior
New Evidence: Memory survey - Shed Exterior

Shed Interior

• Door (on the right)
  
• Floor
  
• Hand sculpture holding ball
  
• Phonograph
  
• Black notebook
  
• Window

New Evidence: Trace Photo - Shed Interior
New Evidence: Photo of Shed Interior

Clue time - Bedroom

• Bedroom floor
  
• Watch (on right bedside table)
  
• Bed
  
• Drawer (left bed side table)

New Evidence: Trace Photo and Memory Survey - Bedroom

Witness Statement - Elle 1

Deduction 1: Where is the contradiction in her statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Elle
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Shed Interior
  
• Answer: Elle Statement 3 “I didn’t bother to go inside” and Elle’s Fingerprints on Window

Deduction 2: Is there any reason to believe that she did in fact clean the shed?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Shed Exterior
  
• Answer: Corpse, shouted the word clean

Deduction 3: Is there any other witness to call on who knows about the staff in the shed?
Hint: Do we have reason to believe there was a third party on the scene?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Shed Interior
  
• Answer: Fingerprints on notebook

Important thing to note: there’s only 3 pieces in the shed, but Elle says the victim bought 4

Witness Statement - Montague

Deduction 4: What’s the lie in Montague's statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Montague
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Montague
  
• Answer: Statement 4 "I didn't step foot in the storage area" and the corresponding Abnormal Heartbeat 4

Deduction 5: What part of his statement implies that he doesn’t know why we’re here?
Hint: In other words, that he doesn't know that Peter is dead

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Montague
  
• Answer: Statement 6 “just ask Peter”

Witness Statement - Montague 2
Deduction 6: What’s the problem with his new statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Montague 2
  
• Trace Photo - Storage Shed Interior
  
• Answer: Statement 4 “I stole the notebook” and the Notebook still being in the shed

New Evidence: Bureau File - Vering

Deduction 7: What’s the proof that Vering knew the victim?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Bedroom,
  
• Answer: Receipt, Zad Vering

New Evidence - Vering’s Notes

Clue time - Shed Interior

• Footprints on floor, to the right of the old set heading towards back window
  
• New fingerprint on top of window, right of Elle's

Hint: Our goal is to keep the case moving. Handing it off to Materials is effectively admitting defeat and leaving the case unfinished.

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Vering’s Notes
  
• Answer: Support Redfin “maybe they could predict where Vering might run off to next” with name of the bank “whole grain” on the notes

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Vering’s Notes
  
• Answer: Oppose Bryan “we have no one else to fill us in” with the contact info on Vering’s notes

At Vera’s shop, you can choose the order of accounts to hear.

New Evidence: Miss A, Miss B, and Mister C’ Witness statements

Who sold which staff? Make three deductions in a row

Deduction 8: What did Miss A sell?

• Evidence 1: Miss A’s Statement
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Shed Interior
  
• Answer: Statement 4 “The one that plays a tune when you open them?” and Phonograph: an openable gap

Deduction 9: What did Miss B sell?

• Evidence 1: Miss B’s Statement
  
• Evidence 2: Storage Shed Photo
  
• Answer: Statement 1“I sold a yellow rubber ball” and the sculpture of the hand holding a yellow ball

Deduction 10: What did Mister C sell?
Hint: With the other two staff figured out, this has to be related to the notebook

• Evidence 1: Mister C's Statement
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement 2 - Montague 2
  
• Answer: Statement 1 “I sold a flower” and Statement 6 “I was rather alarmed when a dried flower dropped out”

What staff is irrelevant to the murder?
Hint: Our goal is to argue that they couldn’t have killed Peter. That is, that they didn’t leave the body in the state it was found in, weren’t activated or weren't deadly.
As a matter of fact, none of the three pieces of staff are correct.

Deduction 11: Why couldn’t the ball have done it?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Trace photo - Bedroom
  
• Answer: Oppose Thena “Couldn’t the ball have turned half the body to ash?” and the Corpse

Deduction 12: Why couldn’t the music box have done it?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Shed Interior
  
• Answer: Oppose Redfins “it’s quite possible the musical box was open at the time of incident” with Phonograph (was last opened a week in the past)

Deduction 13: Why couldn’t the dried flower have done it?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Mr C Witness Statement
  
• Answer: Oppose Bryan’s comment with Mr C witness Statement 6“considering that he plucked off a petal himself”

Deduction 14: What's the contradiction between the two documents on the sale between the victim and Vering?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Bedroom
  
• Evidence 2: Vering’s Notes
  
• Answer: The bedroom receipt “Vering was paid 5000 pounds” and price column

Deduction 15: What’s the fourth staff?
Hint: When Vering sells staff, she draws a circle of blood on them

• Evidence 1: Storage Shed Photo
  
• Answer: The door with the red circle

What items have been moved in odd ways related to the shed?
Hint: Somehow, the victim was split in half, the notebook returned to the shed, and Vering vanished. What can we connect about these three events?

1. Vering’s Notes: the clock with a 7
   
2. Memory Survey -Exterior Shed protective clothing
   
3. Trace Photo - Storage Shed -fingerprints on note
   
4. Transcript - Redfins “there a chance the body was moved with a staff in the shed”
   
5. Witness statement - Montague “if that’s so, why isn’t the diary in the safe?”
   
6. Memory Survey - Bedroom - Pocket Watch, seven hours slow

Deduction 16:What evidence did Vering leave behind?

• Evidence 1:Trace Photo - Storage Shed Interior
  
• Answer: Vering prints on Window

Deduction 17: Who closed the door and killed the victim?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Shed Exterior
  
• Answer: Door “Live in their there for the rest of your life” and a jolt

Deduction 18: What filled the frame between the door and the victim?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Shed Exterior
  
• Answer: Protective Clothing

Memory Survey - Rudger’s Room

• Victim’s body
  
• Bed
  
• Bookshelf drawer on right

New Evidence: Memory Survey - Victim's Room
New Evidence: Bureau file - Rudger and Addendum
New Evidence: Surevelliance Record

You can choose to do the next three rooms, one inmate each, in whatever order you want. I’ll be going clockwise

New Evidence: Bureau File and Addendum - Doug
New Evidence: Witness Statement - Doug

Deduction 1: What’s the first lie with Doug’s statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Doug
  
• Evidence 2: Surveillance Record
  
• Answer: Statement 3 “I haven’t even used my skill once” and Mana release detected from Doug on 12/1

Deduction 2: What’s the second lie?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Doug
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Doug
  
• Answer: Statement 4 “I haven’t had any long talks” and its corresponding Abnormal Heartbeat 4

Info to note: Doug and Rudger would communicate by fogging up the glass and writing messages

New Evidence - Bureau File and Addendum - Elroy

Deduction 3: When did Elroy learn Notrick’s name?

• Hint: The addendum states that Elroy releases mana when he receives memories from the future
  
• Evidence 1: Surveillance Record
  
• Answer: Mana release from Elroy on 12/10

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Elroy

New Evidence: Bureau File and Addendum - Berifin
Clue time - Berifin’s Room

• Floor
  
• Glass wall
  
• Wall hatch
  
• Top of shelf

Note: The connection between the lounge and the victim's bedroom is odd and no one remember setting it up, so it likely came from Doug's skill

Clue Time - Lounge

• The glass wall on the left side of the screen
  
• Purple book on bookshelf (New Evidence - Mystery Novel Impressions)
  
• Floor
  
• Medicine fridge
  
• Food Fridge

New Evidence: Memory Survey and Trace Photo - Lounge

Deduction 4: What’s the thing in the lounge that could have been used as a weapon?
Hint: Something can only affect the victim if she believes it can affect her. Is there anything in here she uses?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Lounge
  
• Answer: Drug fridge (pain medication)

Deduction 5: Why is M so convinced that poisoning the victim is normal behavior?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Berifin
  
• Answer: Skill - Compulsory Trust

Deduction 6: When did Berifin use her skill?

• Evidence 1: Surveillance Report
  
• Answer: Berifin release on 12/8

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Berifin

Deduction 7: What's the first lie in Berifin’s statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Berifin
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Lounge
  
• Answer: Statement 4, “I’ve never laid eyes on the either woman” and Footprints - Berifin

Deduction 8: What’s the next issue with her statement?
Hint: Thena detects abnormal heartbeats when people lie, talk about death, or are agitated

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Berifin
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Berifin
  
• Answer: Statement 3 and its corresponding lack of Abnormal Heartbeat 3

Deduction 9: What statement did Berifin use her power on?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Berifin
  
• Answer: Statement 8, “I would never stoop so low as to tell a lie”

Deduction 10: What is the lie in Berifin's statement she used her power to hide?

• Evidence: Witness Statement - Berifin
  
• Answer: Statement 7, “and as you know, there’s no record of anything"

Deduction 11: How did Berifin leave the message?

• Evidence:Trace Photo - Berifin’s Room
  
• Answer: Stain on glass

Save and Branching Point 1

Hint: We’ve caught the killer and can leave, but we’ve been told in advance that Elroy would like to speak with us after we solve the case

The game pulls up the map, but you can only head to two places - the meeting place or Elroy

Head to the Meeting Place for the Society End

Head to Elroy for the Truth End

Deduction 12: What message did Elroy leave?

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Lounge
  
• Answer: Novel, someone left a note “meals and die”

New Evidence: Witness Statement - Elroy 2

Deduction 13: Who picked up the book after Elroy and erased the message?

• Evidence 1: Mystery Novel Impressions
  
• Answer: Rudger “that was very helpful. thank you”

Deduction 14: What contradicts the old timeline that Elroy told us?

• Evidence 1:Witness Statement - Elroy 2
  
• Evidence 2: Surveillance Report
  
• Answer: “I knew of Mythril's death on the 20th of December” and Rudger died on 12/24

Hint: How would Mythril believing that her meals are toxic affect her?

1. M’s Witness Statement - “for some reason, this innate started losing a lot a weight”
   
2. Elroy Witness Statement - “and she looked so healthy!”
   
3. Memory Survey - Lounge - mystery novel - ”meals and die
   
4. Transcript - Thena’s Statement “I doubt if I'd be able to stomach my meals”
   
5. Memory Survey - Victim’s Room - Corpse "so thin I can see her cheekbones"
   
6. Doug’s Statement - “She looked a little skinner too!”

Deduction 15: What trait makes her refusal to eat important?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File Addendum - Rudger
  
• Answer: Statement Five, Rudger will find something toxic if she believes it to be toxic

Hint: We can argue that we’ve reached the truth of the case, but is there anything more to unpack?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Bureau File - Berifin
  
• Answer: Oppose Thena “why couldn’t the victim explain her situation to M?” with Berifin's Skill - Compulsory Trust

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Mystery Novel Impressions
  
• Answer: Support Redfins “I feel like I’ve lived a case like this before” with Doug’s impression “His attempts at saving her actually killed her!”

Deduction 16: Who would want a murder mystery to play out?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Doug
  
• Answer: Statement 8 “I’ve always wanted to be a suspect in a case!”

Deduction 17: What's the issue in the transcript?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Trace Photo - Lounge
  
• Answer: Contradict Bryan “He used his skill to create the lounge 23 days ago” with Footprints - Berifin, 30 days earlier

Hint: If Doug didn’t bring the lounge into existence, then what else could he have brought?

1. Rudger file - addendum, 1 “There are no records of her from before that time”
   
2. Memory - survey - victims bedroom the drawer had no memory of being opened for over a month
   
3. Trace photo - only book for Rudger's fingerprints - 13 days ago
   
4. Transcript - Bryan’s comment, "there are few traces from the victim"
   
5. Memory survey - lounge Mystery Novel, only words in the book are meals and die
   
6. Elroy’s statement - "Mythril was a mysterious chick who never talked about herself"

Deduction 18: What contradicts the note found in the victim’s room drawer?
Hint: That is, that Rudger has been living in the room for over a month

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Victim's Room
  
• Answer: Drawer has not been opened for over a month

The game will first ask you who was the culprit in the Truth end of the first four cases
In order:

1. Yulia Geller
   
2. Kendrick Hawes
   
3. Elle Miller
   
4. Young Child (Doug Touchstone)

New Evidence: Bureau File - Redfins, Bryan, Thena

Clue Time

• Clothes (jacket and shoes)
  
• Painting
  
• Body
  
• Notepad
  
• Electronic clock on desk
  
• Floor (between desk and cabinet on right)
  
• Shelf (the staff from case 3)

New Evidence - Survey

Deduction 1: What was the murder weapon?

• Evidence 1: Survey
  
• Evidence 2: Survey
  
• Answer: Corpse (Burnt flesh) and Rubber Ball (incinerate power)

Redfins, Thena, and Bryan can be interviewed in any order and you’ll get all of their statements

Deduction 2: Whose statement can we verify with evidence on the scene?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Thena
  
• Evidence 2: Survey
  
• Answer: Statement 4 “I wanted to give him a little scare” and the Painting (bullet hole)

Deduction 3: What does Thena being detained until 11 PM prove?
Hint: Do we have any evidence that points to the victim’s time of death?

• Evidence: Survey
  
• Answer: The electronic clock (9 PM alarm was never turned off)

Deduction 4: What do the heartbeats, or lack thereof, prove?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Redfins
  
• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Redfins
  
• Answer: Statement 7, “I didn’t go back into the room after that” and corresponding lack of Abnormal Heartbeat 7

Memory - Survey

• Clothes
  
• Painting
  
• Notepad (New Evidence - Chief’s Records)
  
• Digital clock
  
• Staff

New Evidence - Memory Survey - Chief’s Office

Deduction 5: What’s the third piece of staff on the scene?
Hint: Remember what they did in Case 3, where they modified a staff's appearance to hide it

• Evidence 1: Chiefs Records
  
• Evidence 2: Survey
  
• Answer: Wrapping Cloth and Painting (painted on cloth)

Deduction 6:What’s the contradiction in assuming that the chief everyone saw was a music box recording?
Hint: If it’s a recording, then all three witnesses should have had identical statements

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Thena
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Bryan
  
• Answer: Thena Statement 2 “he told me to have a seat” and Bryan 3 “he told me to remain standing”

Deduction 7: What’s the issue in the transcript?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Memory Survey - Chief’s Office
  
• Answer: Support Thena "is there no evidence proving he din't commit the crime at 8:10 PM?" and Electronic Clock - turned off by chief at 8:30 PM

Clue Time:

• Clothes
  
• Painting
  
• Staff shelf
  
• Floor by shelf

New Evidence: Trace Photo - Chief's Office

Deduction 8: Why is it possible that the chief's footprints were left by someone else?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Chief’s Office
  
• Answer: Shoes -Trace

Deduction 9: Where could someone hide away on the scene?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Chief’s Office
  
• Answer: Painting - handprint trace

Deduction 10: What makes it unlikely that Bryan fabricated the prints?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Bryan
  
• Answer: Extra Info 1: Traces change with time

Deduction 11:What lead is contained in the transcript?

• Evidence 1: Transcript
  
• Evidence 2: Chief’s Records
  
• Answer: Support Thena “Is there some place we haven’t investigated? and the message at the top “store records in secret safe”

Deduction 12: Where was the Chief hiding the safe?

• Hint: We know about a secret spot that no one other than the chief known about
  
• Evidence 1: Survey
  
• Answer: Painting

Deduction 13:Is there a reason to believe Medan knew of the documents?

• Evidence 1: Survey
  
• Answer: Notebook -Letter threatening to reveal information

New Evidence - Doctor’s Note

Memory Survey - Office

• Tea kettle
  
• Folder on desk
  
• Coat rack

You’ll be given a choice of which if three items to mess with (coat, folder, kettle) and whether or not to escort Bryan out by yourself
The correct answer is the Folder and to have John escort out Bryan

New Evidence: Trace Photo - Mana Affairs Office and Witness Statement - Medan

Deduction 14: What’s the oddity with Medan’s statement?

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Medan
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Medan
  
• Answer: Statement 3“he asked if he could borrow it” and corresponding Abnormal Heartbeat 3

Deduction 15:What’s the contradiction in the documents from the suicide case?

• Evidence 1: Trace Photo - Mana Affairs Office
  
• Evidence 2: Witness Statement - Medan 1
  
• Answer: Fingerprints- Bernard Medan one month in the past and Statement 1 “I’ve used the rope in the past”

Deduction 16:What’s the falsification in the document?
Hint: If we accept that Medan definitely used the rope, then one statement must necessarily be true

• Evidence 1: Witness Statement - Medan
  
• Answer: Abnormal Heartbeat 2

Deduction 17:What contradicts the notion that John is mentally ill?

• Evidence 1:Doctor’s Note
  
• Answer: Line 2, no signs of mental illness

Deduction 18: Who from the case in the past is the note referring to?

• Hint: I can't say the evidence name without giving it away, but there's only one other person in that case
  
• Evidence 1:Bureau File - Redfins
  
• Answer: Her name, Redfins

Deduction 19: Why would Redfins refuse to touch people?

• Evidence 1:Bureau File - Redfins
  
• Answer: Extra Info 1, She can get visual information from people

Deduction 20:Why would Thena be relevant to Redfin’s refusal to touch people?

• Evidence 1: Bureau File - Thena
  
• Answer: Extra Info 1, detection is more effective with close contact

Deduction 21: What’s the fabricated document?
Hint: Notrick says that this fabrication would allow anyone to have done it. One single part of the trace photo or memory survey has to reveal how the murder was committed

• Evidence 1: Memory Survey - Chief’s Office
  
• Answer: Dried Flower was not used recently

Deduction 22: Why could the dried flower allow someone to carry a body into the room without leaving the room?

• Evidence 1: Chief’s Records
  
• Answer: Info on Dried Flower, replica vanishes after 30 minutes

Six transcripts, all six statements from Redfins, all trying to end the case without the real truth


When you meet Redfins, you can choose whether or not to take her hand. There’s slightly different dialogue, but the same ending.