安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
In Bannerlord's case, losing the ability to spawn as an archer is effectively the same as being removed from the game, since all you'll do as a light infantry is feed kills to archers.
That's the main reason I ended up buying Chivalry 2, since archers in that game are actually balanced around the presence of melee weapons. As in, I can pick a melee class without worrying about getting vaporized by a firing squad.
Archers are a part of why i have my gripes with Bannerlord but the bigger problem i have is how TaleWorlds' userbase wants the game to remain intentionally unbalanced so that they can continue to farm kills from human players simply by picking the overpowered units while their enemies are stuck with the bad ones.
Chivalry 2 I respect as the modern medieval fighting game, especially with it's team objective maps. Warband still has a few active servers at times, but it's so much easier to find a Chiv2 match. I never played much of Bannerlord multiplayer (my computer wasn't able to handle it when it first came out) so I don't know how they messed up the archer balance. In Warband's multiplayer archers weren't OP.
I wouldn't be surprised if later down the line, TaleWorlds shuts down the multiplayer mode and Torn Banner's game ends up in a Bannerlord/Chiv2 bundle.