安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
In Bannerlord's case, losing the ability to spawn as an archer is effectively the same as being removed from the game, since all you'll do as a light infantry is feed kills to archers.
That's the main reason I ended up buying Chivalry 2, since archers in that game are actually balanced around the presence of melee weapons. As in, I can pick a melee class without worrying about getting vaporized by a firing squad.
Archers are a part of why i have my gripes with Bannerlord but the bigger problem i have is how TaleWorlds' userbase wants the game to remain intentionally unbalanced so that they can continue to farm kills from human players simply by picking the overpowered units while their enemies are stuck with the bad ones.
Chivalry 2 I respect as the modern medieval fighting game, especially with it's team objective maps. Warband still has a few active servers at times, but it's so much easier to find a Chiv2 match. I never played much of Bannerlord multiplayer (my computer wasn't able to handle it when it first came out) so I don't know how they messed up the archer balance. In Warband's multiplayer archers weren't OP.
I wouldn't be surprised if later down the line, TaleWorlds shuts down the multiplayer mode and Torn Banner's game ends up in a Bannerlord/Chiv2 bundle.