Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
In Bannerlord's case, losing the ability to spawn as an archer is effectively the same as being removed from the game, since all you'll do as a light infantry is feed kills to archers.
That's the main reason I ended up buying Chivalry 2, since archers in that game are actually balanced around the presence of melee weapons. As in, I can pick a melee class without worrying about getting vaporized by a firing squad.
Archers are a part of why i have my gripes with Bannerlord but the bigger problem i have is how TaleWorlds' userbase wants the game to remain intentionally unbalanced so that they can continue to farm kills from human players simply by picking the overpowered units while their enemies are stuck with the bad ones.
Chivalry 2 I respect as the modern medieval fighting game, especially with it's team objective maps. Warband still has a few active servers at times, but it's so much easier to find a Chiv2 match. I never played much of Bannerlord multiplayer (my computer wasn't able to handle it when it first came out) so I don't know how they messed up the archer balance. In Warband's multiplayer archers weren't OP.
I wouldn't be surprised if later down the line, TaleWorlds shuts down the multiplayer mode and Torn Banner's game ends up in a Bannerlord/Chiv2 bundle.