Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For example, the destruction of the being via flamethrower seems completely plausible to me.
Who's to say it's always been vulnerable when landing via a meteor? Additionally, the landscape beneath the being is made up of clearly hollow corridors.
It's completely plausible that fire would be effective shooting down these drier chutes (we see a big plume in the ending), especially if the mutagenic root fluid is no longer working.
It's stated in an epilogue journal that the mutagenic fluid no longer works after being separated from the root for more than a few minutes.
Perhaps killing the being effectively neutralizes the healing trees? In my opinion, there's no good reason to question the ending.
Alternatively, perhaps the Stranger did end up using the flamethrower in the Being's core... But it didn't kill it. Him collapsing and dreaming of what happened after could be just the same as going to sleep in the apartment. The being lives on, surviving the flamethrower attack
It's a very engaging take on the story. I like it a lot
Most (if not all) creatures of the darkwood are vulnerable to fire. Even the seemingly invincible creatures have vulnerable cores.
Military rescue after the burning is not inconsistent. People are much more open minded AFTER a potentially apocalyptic plague burns down, than before. Besides, this "rescue" most likely involves quarantines, health checkups, and sensible scientific scrutiny - it's not purely altruistic.