安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題









Thanks...
Also update to the P-43 4-6-2.
equals Shift + - (not Num -) on german keyboard layout. Took me a bit of research to figure that out.
A question:
- In your spreadsheet, for the T-22 Ten Wheeler, A-23 American and the F-71 Santa Fe you are using a factor 7.1 instead of 2,000 when calculating the total weight of the fuel, might that be an error (also affecting the calculations of the tons tables for those locomotives).
PS! I also noticed the pounds/gallon being set to 8.43 in your formulas, not 8.37 (for room temperature water), as already mentioned.
0.0% - 21,500 tons
0.5% - 6,150 tons
1.0% - 3,600 tons
1.5% - 2,540 tons
2.0% - 1,950 tons
2.5% - 1,600 tons
3.0% - 1,350 tons
3.5% - 1,150 tons
4.0% - 1,020 tons
4.5% - 915 tons
May I have a couple of suggestions for your spreadsheet? (why do I even bother asking for permission, I'm gonna do it anyway)
First is the "useful" pull force at different grades. Real as in "Pulling force minus weight of the fully bunkered loco+tender".
(ie. For G16 at 0 grade =M2-K2*0.45359/1000)
Second is the "weight to real force ratio", so how much of a percentage of total tractive effort is actually used to pull the cars as opposed to the whole train.
(So, again for G16 at 0 grade =W2/(M2/100) )
I found the latter number to be fascinating, like A26 at grade 2 is the worst of the bunch at just under 72% K28T sits firmly at 85.5%.
Just a thought.
2. all I can say about the T-21 is...𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘺 𝘑𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴