安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Odd that I and Mr. Keynes agreed on *anything* but chronologically-speaking, his stance and mine simply discerned the same reality; thing is: to do so solvently, what you *need* is a self-growing economy, and that only ever happens via private property, capitalism, not state-run anything.
To a statesman, or those who'd strive for that career: figure yourself being a customer for your workforce to get the necessary gear; not unlike a head of the national executive branch arranging to buy military hardware; a single government contract, fulfilled, is almost always easily sufficient to set a corporate titan for life!
In the end: you really only have those two main pathways; but the one that works every single time is to really reduce the government sector.
If anybody wanted to design a program to destroy a state, society, region, or culture, you *cannot* do a higher-quality job of discerning the program to do such damage than a command economy, which's *precisely* what Marxism in practice is; combined with overt *stealing*, via "Redistributing the wealth"... now some of that kind of thing *can and does* occur, legitimately, say some rich man decides, as many're historically prone to doing, to go into philanthropy; that's that to a T, and since he's oh, giving away the fruits of his own labor, or the work he bought, (hence legitimately his, as is anything bought the property of the buyer, so long as the sale's legitimately able to have been truly free to be done)... that's what's going on.
Capitalism works, no other system has any hope of success. Simple as that.
Marx sided with slavery, he was really remarkably pro-slavery, as he laid out... you failed to research this matter at all to speak of.