安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I see other 2 things going on-
-people played the maps and gave valid feedback
I want you to know I appreciate the feedback, especially the honest descriptions of what is good or bad about the map sets.
Here is something happening also, and it doesn't help anyone:
-people didn't play the maps and assumed the maps were too easy and/or didn't play them and/or commented on the concept of the map only, without playing.
I know tutorials and simulators are not very popular, so I am grateful for any feedback on them. It says "game mechanics tutorial"...What about that sounds hard, to you??? I know a lot of hardcore gamers play Battleblock Theater but that doesn't mean everyone likes such difficulty. Please read the description.
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I appreciate it.
I'd like to give a summary of the feedback so far:
On the positive feedback:
I am glad you enjoyed the maps and/or they taught you some game mechanics. It means a lot when my level editing pays off (happy players? happy level editor!). The maps I am proud of take me weeks to make - as did this one. Hopefully you played THEN reviewed the maps!