Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I see other 2 things going on-
-people played the maps and gave valid feedback
I want you to know I appreciate the feedback, especially the honest descriptions of what is good or bad about the map sets.
Here is something happening also, and it doesn't help anyone:
-people didn't play the maps and assumed the maps were too easy and/or didn't play them and/or commented on the concept of the map only, without playing.
I know tutorials and simulators are not very popular, so I am grateful for any feedback on them. It says "game mechanics tutorial"...What about that sounds hard, to you??? I know a lot of hardcore gamers play Battleblock Theater but that doesn't mean everyone likes such difficulty. Please read the description.
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I appreciate it.
I'd like to give a summary of the feedback so far:
On the positive feedback:
I am glad you enjoyed the maps and/or they taught you some game mechanics. It means a lot when my level editing pays off (happy players? happy level editor!). The maps I am proud of take me weeks to make - as did this one. Hopefully you played THEN reviewed the maps!