Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
I see other 2 things going on-
-people played the maps and gave valid feedback
I want you to know I appreciate the feedback, especially the honest descriptions of what is good or bad about the map sets.
Here is something happening also, and it doesn't help anyone:
-people didn't play the maps and assumed the maps were too easy and/or didn't play them and/or commented on the concept of the map only, without playing.
I know tutorials and simulators are not very popular, so I am grateful for any feedback on them. It says "game mechanics tutorial"...What about that sounds hard, to you??? I know a lot of hardcore gamers play Battleblock Theater but that doesn't mean everyone likes such difficulty. Please read the description.
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I appreciate it.
I'd like to give a summary of the feedback so far:
On the positive feedback:
I am glad you enjoyed the maps and/or they taught you some game mechanics. It means a lot when my level editing pays off (happy players? happy level editor!). The maps I am proud of take me weeks to make - as did this one. Hopefully you played THEN reviewed the maps!