Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
I see other 2 things going on-
-people played the maps and gave valid feedback
I want you to know I appreciate the feedback, especially the honest descriptions of what is good or bad about the map sets.
Here is something happening also, and it doesn't help anyone:
-people didn't play the maps and assumed the maps were too easy and/or didn't play them and/or commented on the concept of the map only, without playing.
I know tutorials and simulators are not very popular, so I am grateful for any feedback on them. It says "game mechanics tutorial"...What about that sounds hard, to you??? I know a lot of hardcore gamers play Battleblock Theater but that doesn't mean everyone likes such difficulty. Please read the description.
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I appreciate it.
I'd like to give a summary of the feedback so far:
On the positive feedback:
I am glad you enjoyed the maps and/or they taught you some game mechanics. It means a lot when my level editing pays off (happy players? happy level editor!). The maps I am proud of take me weeks to make - as did this one. Hopefully you played THEN reviewed the maps!