Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Here a table of all the values I found. If a bonus won't increase further by increasing the length it is marked with a 'm'.
Size | Fertility-Bonus along side
(y*x) | x | y
-------|--------|-------
2*7+ | 30m | 20m
2*6 | 26 | 20m
2*5 | 20 | 16
2*4 | 16 | 16
2*3 | 13 | 13
2*2 | 6 | 6
3*7+ | 46m | 36m
3*6 | 40 | 33
3*5 | 33 | 30
3*4 | 26 | 26
3*3 | 20 | 20
4*6+ | 50m | 43m
4*5 | 43 | 40
4*4 | 33 | 33
5*6+| 50m | 46m
5*5 | 46 | 46m
0 tile (tiles that well occupies) - +26
1 - +23
2 - +20
3 - +16
4 - +13
5 - +10
6 - +6
7 - +3
So 3x3 well is better than 3x3 canal, but every other well is worse than same size canal. And wells don't use water table, so they may be a good fertility increasing alternative on waterless maps.