Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"If you are an impatient warmonger and barrel straight into war you will find yourself under
heavy attack from the entirety of the United Nations faster than you can put up a white flag.
This is very likely true to life. (At least I like to think so. Putin may prove me wrong) "
There was a snide comment about keeping politics out of this. Seems during the current events that comment was removed. I find that amusing in retrospect.
Not sure sir. I've never actually played North Korea. I would imagine you have to deal with corruption prior to starting on production... corruption and rampant inflation can both lower production faster than you can manually grow it. That's what you are describing.
Challenge accepted. I'll let you know when I have a chance to mess with it.
I don't see a huge discrepancy in Economic Health. My statement is that EH is a derived stat. Having a high EH will help in the areas I listed above. Overall EH has an effect on the economy. For sure. I'm saying that as a derived stat you are better off paying attention to the areas that make up EH and paying attention to it. Infra/Telcom spending, inflation, corruption, etc. All of which I put a lot of emphasis on. I don't look at it after the first couple of years not because it is not beneficial, but because I am looking at the stats its derived from. So its good.
Inflation. Dunno what the other gent said. If there is doubt. I would say test. Create a save point and intentionally run up inflation and run for 10 years. then reload and do the same thing with keeping it in check. see the difference. I'm sure you'll see the statements I made about losing GDP with deflation, and rising costs with inflation will prove to be true.
I kept increasing & then moving on but the increase in demand was so fast for each commodity that I was never able to self sustain even just the Agricultural sector. I also tried another new game going in reverse (from bottom up figuring the increase in the bottom production would put an increase on the above layers' demands so I could handle it that way). It was working much better but eventually even that strat saw skyrocketing increase demand nullifying my efforts.
So here I am in 2038 still haven't balanced even the Agriculture sector yet. What am I missing? Why is it impossible to balance these demands?
1) Economic Health - main advantage (by far far far) of maxing this is a huge direct influence on Resource production growth - at 100% it doubles the growth, at 0% it stops all growth. As you left it out and mentioned the Eco Health has no significant, I believe your experience says the effect on Resource production growth is not true, right?
Although you mentioned Telecom spending raises resource production, according to 101 guide this is because Telecom and Infrastructure spending are the highest contributors to high Economic Health, which is the one impacting the production growth.