Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No, you'll ask for buffs and/or nerfs for characters that need them. Unfortunately for the games in the Unbalanced Trinity, a certain brand of madness has gripped their playerbases to think that unfairness is somehow fair.
In Bannerlord specifically, even if both teams have enough honor to not spam archers, you have a multitude of factions where one of them's good at everything, one of them is absolute dogwater and two other factions are weak against the best faction in the game. Players would rather the game stay unbalanced because they wanna farm for free kills in a PVP game
Thankfully, Chivalry 2 exists if you want a PVP medieval game.
On the opposite end of things, Seong Mi-na received way too many buffs with the few nerfs she received being little more than a light slap on the wrist, and her being OP is perfectly fine because who has time to work for your wins when your pants are already halfway down your legs?
Having an underpowered class in a game where players need to stick to class roles is somehow okay, because it pressures people into buying DLC guns that are better than the base game offerings