Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also most of the implants can't be used outside of specific spots that devs want you to use them. Meanwhile in the original you can use your implants whenever and wherever you want.
Also yeah the story is shit, they took the complex question of how far should human augmentation go into should they allow medicine or not.
As for System Shock and Deus Ex, well sorry you don't like them, but that doesn't change the fact that they're immersive sims. I mean if you just enjoy the surface level imm-sims then that's fine, I'm glad you enjoyed the games you enjoyed.
But I couldnt agree more on the Pathologic 1 & 2, those games are brilliant immersive sim games, though they are not considered that. Respect for putting them on the list
i think the majority of people ive come across online equate immersive sim games with some kind of cultural checklist, where the game even if popular, almost feels like it gatekeeps itself from mainstream gamers with not only the nuance in freedom, but the unique personality the games bring. sure, cruelty squad and deus ex are ultimately very different games, but everybody can look at it with their own two eyes on their uniqueness as open-level games with iconic visuals and freedom of approach and just say "yeah, this is an immersive sim"