Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Btw is there going to be a version with shorter trains?
Have you seen the electrics they tested in 1975/1976 (they used the years as the road numbers) the had a similar feel but based more off of road switchers than the mainline wide cab units.
The length restriction was part of the nationalization, per @REVO's lore, along with abolishing PSR (because it is not "precision", it's not "scheduled" and barely qualifies as railroading). I'm sure the logic behind it was to ensure trains could actually fit in passing sidings, which has actually been a problem in recent years under PSR. Trains have gotten longer, yes, but the railroads have done practically nothing to improve their infrastructure to accommodate them, so trains are blocking each other more frequently, which is why service has deteriorated (all those supply chain shortages we've been having are partly the result of PSR).
Also, hello from a fellow Ohio-adjacent pleb (I live about an hour away from that dumpster fire).
Also I love the details @evil.iguana added. I'm a state away from that incident if you are talking about Ohio lol