安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
By comparison both Weaver and Faulke offer only a temporary arrangement after which they will attempt to resist and break free just as Carter did.
Weir is driven by scientific curiosity whereas Weaver and Faulke see the merging only as a means to an end.
With that in mind it makes sense to choose to merge with Weir regardless of how the story progresses afterwards.
It's like the game does not take into acount that you could be trying to supress instead of suport someone.
My Pc and Duo core e7500, 4 gb of ram and 8400gs directX 10.1 Windows 7 64 Bits .......