Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
the numbers that I gave were being very liberal with my times: effectively 2 minutes to load the game from the executable/library (loading the game felt very front heavy, and after doing some memory profiling on it most things in this game seem to be rather memory efficient after initial creation), and 2 minutes to go through the results screen, evit the game, and wait for sync to complete (steam raises a hissy fit at times if this does not complete before the same game, or any game is launched). I did these considerations if the player is not playing this game on a very fast machine (though I do assume a faster internet connection)
so accounting for small math you were doing between 2, and 2.5 minutes per run your system must have a good performance setup
Used clonehenge on casual and took under an hour
not to mention by even having such a guide in a publicly viewable location means that any marketing statement from braging about such a thing is automatically called into question, and then this method could probably be replicated on any device that the date can be manually altered. calling the metric into question on all of it.