安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
獎勵
1 
The trend goes back to Constantine's reforms however. In the East many Goths made up the Palatina Guard however they were switched out for Isuarians and Armenians at 400AD when the Goths rebelled against the ERE.
Franks also settled into Roman territory peacefully, as Foederati. When they attacked Syagrius, they were attacking the enemy of Romulus Augustus, though he had been deposed by Odoacer at that point. The Franks and Goths make for perfectly valid successors to the Empire, as Justinian had sacked and destroyed so much, devastating Roman infrastructure and depopulating Italy during the messy Gothic wars (even destroying the senate), creating some of the first tensions between West and East.
Don't forget the Iconoclast controversy too, further dividing the Churches.