安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
1 
The trend goes back to Constantine's reforms however. In the East many Goths made up the Palatina Guard however they were switched out for Isuarians and Armenians at 400AD when the Goths rebelled against the ERE.
Franks also settled into Roman territory peacefully, as Foederati. When they attacked Syagrius, they were attacking the enemy of Romulus Augustus, though he had been deposed by Odoacer at that point. The Franks and Goths make for perfectly valid successors to the Empire, as Justinian had sacked and destroyed so much, devastating Roman infrastructure and depopulating Italy during the messy Gothic wars (even destroying the senate), creating some of the first tensions between West and East.
Don't forget the Iconoclast controversy too, further dividing the Churches.