Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
The trend goes back to Constantine's reforms however. In the East many Goths made up the Palatina Guard however they were switched out for Isuarians and Armenians at 400AD when the Goths rebelled against the ERE.
Franks also settled into Roman territory peacefully, as Foederati. When they attacked Syagrius, they were attacking the enemy of Romulus Augustus, though he had been deposed by Odoacer at that point. The Franks and Goths make for perfectly valid successors to the Empire, as Justinian had sacked and destroyed so much, devastating Roman infrastructure and depopulating Italy during the messy Gothic wars (even destroying the senate), creating some of the first tensions between West and East.
Don't forget the Iconoclast controversy too, further dividing the Churches.