Terraria
76 人が評価
Princess to Queen - No Bounce
   
アワード
お気に入り
お気に入り
お気に入りから削除
Resource Packs: Fun/Silly, Other Packs
ファイルサイズ
投稿日
更新日
85.884 KB
2021年6月10日 17時56分
2022年12月4日 12時24分
3 項目の変更履歴 ( 表示 )

サブスクライブしてダウンロード
Princess to Queen - No Bounce

解説
Changes the Princess to a Queen.

This is a more SFW version for those of you that found the other NSFW.

Link to my other version: https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2512483875

There is a shimmer variant. It is a palette swap like the normal shimmer princess and is also SFW.
51 件のコメント
officermine123150 2024年6月9日 12時01分 
This comment section is weird, poor creator
DivingLight 2023年9月9日 10時33分 
im more concerned about why this item is still up but i agree with the other two
Spookypizza 2023年9月9日 2時42分 
IM WITH LIL GIFTED LOL
Lil' Gifted 2023年8月20日 17時06分 
this comment section is...
concerning
Everitt  [作成者] 2023年7月10日 15時28分 
Thank you for the clarification; I think I understand your point now. To clarify myself, it was less seeing the princess and thinking "I am going to sexualize this entity" and more thinking "I would prefer an attractive woman over this."
DivingLight 2023年7月10日 11時19分 
i agree with marisa cause your most recent point everitt is just perplexing but also concerning
Dev (Goofy Fox) 2023年7月10日 0時16分 
No I don’t think you’re getting the point here… the point I’m making is her canonical age is still within child limits. Making a sexualized adult version just… really puts me off. Also, thanks for telling me that the community can in fact get worse because…. What the fuck.
Everitt  [作成者] 2023年7月9日 5時55分 
I suppose that you will remain single your entire life because at one point you were a child and that means any and every one that shows interest in you is clearly a pedophile. Look m8, I drew an adult woman and that is what this mod adds. Only difference between this and and any other replacer for the princess is that 1. this is based off of her original design and/or 2. this is called queen (some out there keep as princess when they big tittify her). I'm sorry if the fact that at one point the princess was a child bothers you but we aren't looking at child princess here.
Dev (Goofy Fox) 2023年7月8日 22時03分 
Still, this is incredibly concerning, having a older version of a character as an excuse to have a sexual arousion towards the character. If they are a low age they should not be touched sexually like this PERIOD. No matter if you age them up or what not.
Everitt  [作成者] 2023年7月6日 3時57分 
No, this is the opposite of 5000 year old loli. With 5000 year old loli the sexualization of a clearly child like body is justified by the supposed canon age of the character. Here I have a character with a clearly adult body but is based on a character that has a lower age. You are saying that they are a child despite the fact they clearly have the body of an adult; this makes them the exact opposite of the 5000 year old loli logic. However, This also doesn't completely apply to what I have made as what I have made isn't an adult bodied character with a lower age but an imagining of an adult form of a character. Therefore, a adult bodied character with an adult age.

Do you see why the 5000 year old loli is a bad comparison as an argument against me?