For the People

For the People

59 ratings
Agent Stats in For the People
By The Mogician
Are you tired of not being able to figure out what these stupid agents are good for? Fret no more. I found the stats in the game's files.
2
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
How I think the system works
I think how the game works is that you would get these random investigations where you can assign agents to. The assigned agent's skill gets checked against the required skill of said task and you would get the results come morning. If the agent assigned is not skilled enough, you fail the task.
Stats of Agents
Andre Brasillach
Strength: 1
Surveillance: 1
Social: 1

Adeline Brahe
Strength: 0
Surveillance: 1
Social: 3

Anthony Palme
Strength: 3
Surveillance: 0
Social: 1

Gerhard Merkel
Strength: 1
Surveillance: 0
Social: 3

Clark Orwell
Strength: 3
Surveillance: 1
Social: 1

Abyad Alshah
Strength: 2
Surveillance: 1
Social: 1

Catherine Hirsch
Strength: 1
Surveillance: 1
Social: 2

Henry Taggert
Strength: 1
Surveillance: 2
Social: 1

John Overton
Strength: 1
Surveillance: 3
Social: 1

Albin Arrow
Strength: 2
Surveillance: 1
Social: 0

Eric Hoffmann
Strength: 0
Surveillance: 1
Social: 2
How does this help?
Well, the main issue with this game is that the agent files does a poor job at telling you what the agent is good at. When you get an investigation, however, you can clearly see what skills each of the options require and you can therefore reference this table to assign the best agent for the task.

For example:
When it says interrogate witness, you want to assign someone with good social skill
When it says tail someone, you want to assign someone with good surveillance skill
When it says beat someone, you want to assign someone with good strength skill
Source of Data
I found the data at:
Steam\steamapps\common\For the People\game\documents\agents.json
6 Comments
Nevermore 4 Dec, 2024 @ 7:17pm 
very good 蛤蛤,helps a lot
[limit] Серый волк 3 Dec, 2020 @ 7:26am 
DomaLIama, тоже согласен. Убило всё впечатление о проекте. Единственный достаточно интерактивный элемент закоридорен и испорчен на корню(
///
also agree. Killed the whole impression of the project. The only sufficiently interactive element is corroded and ruined in the bud (
DomaLIama 17 Aug, 2020 @ 8:36am 
Thanks for this, it helps tremendously.

I like the investigations and searching for clues via context, but as it is there are no clues on potential pitfalls there are to different agent tasks so the entire process is opaque to the point it might as well be a roll of the dice.
The Mogician  [author] 14 Aug, 2020 @ 5:22pm 
@Aldodrem obviously there are checks for the options you choose as I stated above. If you send an intern to the sexual harasser but you send a male agent, obviously he is not going to get harassed. You still need to do some reading comprehension for the game, but with the stats I listed, it should be much more obvious.
Aldodrem 14 Aug, 2020 @ 9:04am 
That helps but still doesn't solve the issue. Some of the options for events even if you sent the rank 3 will still result in an auto fail.
It appears you need to pick the correct action than match it to the matching agent.
Colorado Dyes 14 Aug, 2020 @ 7:30am 
Sorted by agent name, maybe?