Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
@FunnyKing
If your game supports 21:9 or 32:9 resolution without stretching the images or zoom in its for sure an advantage.
In shooters for example enemies dont surprise me so often, cause i already see them in my angle.Its funny. :)
In some shooters in need to lower my aspect ratio/resolution from 32:9 to 21:9 cause otherwise i would loose to many fps. But even 21:9 is an advantage.
On my screen its a bit a compromise cause my panel have great colors, great contrast and a great brightness. But cause of this ive a little bit a disadvantage at the pixel reaction time even if the monitor have 120 Hz. ^^
For Windows, strategy games, simulations and stuff like that its only great and gives a great experience. :)