Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
So a "-2 upwind compared" would be due to the 'base' penalty & then the bonuses are tallied from there leading to the higher amounts
That makes more sense, thanks!
Wondering if I should go Drekkar for trade runs, or just stick with Frigate & smaller crew so I can waste less cargo on storing food for far more trade goods?
Why don't the numbers seem to add up to the bonuses each ship has for up/down'wind?
Take the Full-rigged ship has: "downwind +2, upwind +0"
Which would be a difference of '2', not '4', right?
Same with the Windjammer: "downwind +5, upwind +2"
Which seeing upwind vs downwind is opposing directions, not just simple subtraction, it should be a difference of '7', right?
Could anyone explain plz?
Is it maybe taking into account the base movement as a factor or something?
Thought the movement was just number of tiles you can move in battle, with the up/down'wind being the overworld speed?
One quick correct The Blackwing Galleass only has 4 cannon slots.
And two quick changes from the most recent update. The Full-rigged and Iron Clad now both have +2 downwind