?

Because Yamato was better. Fight me.

i agree with the destroyer one because us battleships need a way to one shot destroyers because they have a way and its called torpedoes

real tho

because you are stupid enough to keep playing it and pay money for it

It's "Action Stations" Noy "Actiomn Statioms"!

that actualy helped why u hating on him

Thanks, Sherlock

in order 1 look at the historical battle of samar, several US destroyers took a bunch of cruiser and battle ship shells but because they over penetrated and didnt explode inside the ships it was like shooting a big pop can with a pellet gun. as soon as the japanese swapped to HE shells uss samuel b roberts disintegrageted 2 its a bit of a week argument but yamato had few more refits then musashi and among other things recieved better (and the only) radar set in the japanese fleet as well as a better AA suite. 3 this one is just a programming thing. the planes are basically one entity with a health bar. if you want them to be damaged realistically then each one would need a collision mesh, hit boxes and bug physics tweaks. not impossible but id rather them put effort into subs and more late 1800's designs for ships.

hope that helps

most large balance complaints are fixed in time or the result of winers. ask yourself, which are you?

On the left are pretty reasonable complaints, on the right is just a sad doge with the quote "Action Stations" (plays sometimes when starting a battle).