Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I reduced the amount of days needed to take territories without forts.
Reduced supply so the AI has more armies. AI seems more efficient this way at sieging and expansion overall, keep in mind that having longer battles makes the AI reinforce battles a lot more so having more armies though smaller is not an issue, that being said is still just a bit higher than vanilla. From 5 (vanilla) to 6 when it was 14 previously. The thought was to have fewer armies but much bigger and it worked and it was fun but it really hurts the AI when they need to deal with more than 1 war or more than 1 theatre of war and also like I said previously having more armies helps them a lot at sieging.