Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español – España (spanska – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spanska – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (portugisiska – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisiska – Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Friend attacked rolled a 4 on the first roll, he then rolled a 1 for the effect roll, since he failed the 3+ roll would that mean he takes the damage from the fight or can he just keep rolling until he gets the 3+ 4+ and 5+ all in a row without any drawbacks. I think he was thinking damage is prevented to both player and monster while I was thinking just the damage to the monster is prevented. I viewed it as needing to roll a 2+ then 3+ then 4+ and lastly 5+ all in a row and if any of those failed you would take damage. He viewed it as the affect being seprate from the attack roll I think.