Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Friend attacked rolled a 4 on the first roll, he then rolled a 1 for the effect roll, since he failed the 3+ roll would that mean he takes the damage from the fight or can he just keep rolling until he gets the 3+ 4+ and 5+ all in a row without any drawbacks. I think he was thinking damage is prevented to both player and monster while I was thinking just the damage to the monster is prevented. I viewed it as needing to roll a 2+ then 3+ then 4+ and lastly 5+ all in a row and if any of those failed you would take damage. He viewed it as the affect being seprate from the attack roll I think.