安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Anti-nuclear missiles can be built much faster than regular nukes, for half the price, and can fire much faster. You'd need to send a cluster of nukes - probably at least six, ideally more - in a single barrage to overcome a prepared nuclear defense. This same price can net you at least several experimental units which can't be defeated with a simple anti-nuclear missile and actually respond to commands.
Nuclear missiles are more of a way to catch someone off-guard if they either don't have the resources for anti-nukes or don't anticipate you using them, such as if they neglect to scout.
Personally, I'd just invest in experimental units - they usually cost less than a single nuclear missile and tend to cause more problems for the enemy.