Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Anti-nuclear missiles can be built much faster than regular nukes, for half the price, and can fire much faster. You'd need to send a cluster of nukes - probably at least six, ideally more - in a single barrage to overcome a prepared nuclear defense. This same price can net you at least several experimental units which can't be defeated with a simple anti-nuclear missile and actually respond to commands.
Nuclear missiles are more of a way to catch someone off-guard if they either don't have the resources for anti-nukes or don't anticipate you using them, such as if they neglect to scout.
Personally, I'd just invest in experimental units - they usually cost less than a single nuclear missile and tend to cause more problems for the enemy.