Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Anti-nuclear missiles can be built much faster than regular nukes, for half the price, and can fire much faster. You'd need to send a cluster of nukes - probably at least six, ideally more - in a single barrage to overcome a prepared nuclear defense. This same price can net you at least several experimental units which can't be defeated with a simple anti-nuclear missile and actually respond to commands.
Nuclear missiles are more of a way to catch someone off-guard if they either don't have the resources for anti-nukes or don't anticipate you using them, such as if they neglect to scout.
Personally, I'd just invest in experimental units - they usually cost less than a single nuclear missile and tend to cause more problems for the enemy.