安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
獎勵
In retrospect, it feels like there was an effort to make the maps look a particular way, but in the process it lost the visual cues for the players, which, when added to the exact timing nature of many puzzles, made the levels functionally unplayable for me.
The first is the number of exact timing puzzles that are encountered - and by exact I mean split second timing needed. This first shows up here when you get the portal gun. I may be a midling player, but I did complete the main story and the multiplayer portion of the game, and I don't recall either of them requiring that degree of precision.
The second is the visual language used on these maps. Portal 2 followed the Portal launguage of thigns that are white or grey tend to be portalable surfaces while metals are not. Here, there are lots of concrete areas that you can't put a portal on, which is frustrating, but it got worse when there were other surfaces that didn't look like you could place portals on, that were required placements for the solution to the test.