Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
In retrospect, it feels like there was an effort to make the maps look a particular way, but in the process it lost the visual cues for the players, which, when added to the exact timing nature of many puzzles, made the levels functionally unplayable for me.
The first is the number of exact timing puzzles that are encountered - and by exact I mean split second timing needed. This first shows up here when you get the portal gun. I may be a midling player, but I did complete the main story and the multiplayer portion of the game, and I don't recall either of them requiring that degree of precision.
The second is the visual language used on these maps. Portal 2 followed the Portal launguage of thigns that are white or grey tend to be portalable surfaces while metals are not. Here, there are lots of concrete areas that you can't put a portal on, which is frustrating, but it got worse when there were other surfaces that didn't look like you could place portals on, that were required placements for the solution to the test.