Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
In retrospect, it feels like there was an effort to make the maps look a particular way, but in the process it lost the visual cues for the players, which, when added to the exact timing nature of many puzzles, made the levels functionally unplayable for me.
The first is the number of exact timing puzzles that are encountered - and by exact I mean split second timing needed. This first shows up here when you get the portal gun. I may be a midling player, but I did complete the main story and the multiplayer portion of the game, and I don't recall either of them requiring that degree of precision.
The second is the visual language used on these maps. Portal 2 followed the Portal launguage of thigns that are white or grey tend to be portalable surfaces while metals are not. Here, there are lots of concrete areas that you can't put a portal on, which is frustrating, but it got worse when there were other surfaces that didn't look like you could place portals on, that were required placements for the solution to the test.