安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
You're singing my song. :) I feel the same way about all games. I pay to play functional games that should have already been tested & debugged before being sold. I don't pay to spend my time testing games, writing up bug reports to post on forums, & waiting around for patches - that what professional testers get paid to do. I know nothing is perfect, and I can understand minor hiccups on launch day, but I have a very low tolerance when high-impact issues prevent proper game-play. I'm keeping an eye out for patch notes to help me decide when it's a good time for me to buy so I can hopefully enjoy the game without (m)any major race-ending issues.
It's a great game offline but when you set aside time on limited nights due to work, kids ect... And it's ruined by quite big issues not small issues it set me off hence some of the wording.
I hate that this kind of thing is becoming the norm on games
I know they will fix it and that's great but I want them to know it's not ok
Offline by the way no problems but I bought this for the community sim racing aspect.