Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
You're singing my song. :) I feel the same way about all games. I pay to play functional games that should have already been tested & debugged before being sold. I don't pay to spend my time testing games, writing up bug reports to post on forums, & waiting around for patches - that what professional testers get paid to do. I know nothing is perfect, and I can understand minor hiccups on launch day, but I have a very low tolerance when high-impact issues prevent proper game-play. I'm keeping an eye out for patch notes to help me decide when it's a good time for me to buy so I can hopefully enjoy the game without (m)any major race-ending issues.
It's a great game offline but when you set aside time on limited nights due to work, kids ect... And it's ruined by quite big issues not small issues it set me off hence some of the wording.
I hate that this kind of thing is becoming the norm on games
I know they will fix it and that's great but I want them to know it's not ok
Offline by the way no problems but I bought this for the community sim racing aspect.