Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You're singing my song. :) I feel the same way about all games. I pay to play functional games that should have already been tested & debugged before being sold. I don't pay to spend my time testing games, writing up bug reports to post on forums, & waiting around for patches - that what professional testers get paid to do. I know nothing is perfect, and I can understand minor hiccups on launch day, but I have a very low tolerance when high-impact issues prevent proper game-play. I'm keeping an eye out for patch notes to help me decide when it's a good time for me to buy so I can hopefully enjoy the game without (m)any major race-ending issues.
It's a great game offline but when you set aside time on limited nights due to work, kids ect... And it's ruined by quite big issues not small issues it set me off hence some of the wording.
I hate that this kind of thing is becoming the norm on games
I know they will fix it and that's great but I want them to know it's not ok
Offline by the way no problems but I bought this for the community sim racing aspect.