65
Прорецензовані
товари
0
Товарів
у акаунті

Останні рецензії користувача Phelps

< 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 >
Показані результати 1–10 із 65
Ніхто ще не оцінив цю рецензію як корисну
5.7 год. загалом (5.2 год на момент рецензування)
It's warm and fuzzy, which is what it was trying to be; just don't expect it to be anything more.

The only problem I have with this VN is the lack of ambiance or sound effects but hey... it's 0 dollars.
Додано 28 липня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
Ніхто ще не оцінив цю рецензію як корисну
3.9 год. загалом (3.3 год на момент рецензування)
The ONLY good Amnesia game.
Додано 13 липня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
Людей вважають цю рецензію корисною: 3
Людей вважають цю рецензію кумедною: 2
1.6 год. загалом
Generic shooter number infinitum, except this time it's ugly because it's "Artistic" apparently.

Did we really need another game that's trying to ride the 'muh nostalgia' and 'muh abstract art' wave? There's already a thousand of these. How about you make something that isn't abhorrent to look at / engage with.

The gameplay isn't much better, it's about as ugly and dime-a-dozen as this game's artstyle. There's absolutely nothing unique about it, you have 4 different classes with 'unique' abilities, such as, get this, a grappling hook, and that's it.
The enemies aren't faring any better. They suffer the 'artistic vision' of the artist and therefore are very forgettable.
In terms of actual gameplay design, their only gimmick is that they pick up 'weapons' and use them against you. Yet none of them are interesting enough for you to have to change your strategy in dealing with them.
So, the shooting is braindead, enemies are braindead... is there anything good about this game?
not really, unless you want to count millennial humor as such.

Just don't bother. There are many better games to spend your time on than this, the game's by no means utter trash, but it's so mediocre you might as well go back to playing Deep Rock Galactic or Helldivers.
Додано 4 травня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
1 людина вважає цю рецензію корисною
3.4 год. загалом
Yes. Hell yeah even.
Додано 19 березня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
Ніхто ще не оцінив цю рецензію як корисну
24.5 год. загалом (24.1 год на момент рецензування)
Good fun with friends.
Додано 17 березня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
Людей вважають цю рецензію корисною: 12
35.1 год. загалом
On it's own, the game's an easy 8.5/10.

The real issues stem from 3 things, mainly, while they don't ruin the game, they could certainly be improved.

1. Pacing, the pacing of the general story line is fine, especially if you go for the left flowchart before the right flowchart. But only then. The game also has issues when it comes to exposition dumps, unfortunately this is a recurring problem with Visual Novels in General, but whenever you're given a piece of information, you're repeatedly told that piece of information over and over again, to really hammer it in your head. It'd be fine if it was just one or two things, but this game does it CONSTANTLY , with details that might not even matter. In this case it comes in the form of 'flashbacks' via Aiba's vision.
This game could easily be cut by a solid 30% if they improved on this one aspect of it alone.

2. This game can't tell if it wants to be 'read', or 'solved', they seem to be in a constant clash with each other where the writers go out of their way to explain certain details to the audience when they could've easily pieced it together themselves, or at least taken a good guess at. At it's core, this is supposed to be a detective game, but judging by how often the game has characters tell you the solutions to certain 'problems', or just give you info you could've pieced together instead, and judging by the lack of any real Interrogation scenes which are standard for detective VNs, (There's a few, none of them are noteworthy except the one, which is also easy to solve) it would appear the writer has little to no faith in the audience to come to their own conclusions and instead has characters spell it out for them. this is further reinforced by the main villain explaining every single detail to you, effectively the writers deciding this game isn't made for an audience that wants to think.

3. Inconsistencies with the plot. There's a few noteworthy ones, the most 'annoying' one is how utterly alone Date is.
He has the backing of an entire secret police organization behind him and more, and yet whenever he's faced with an emergency he's the only one to show up. It feels extremely unnatural and forced.

Other than that, the game's great, the main mystery's awesome and the characters are memorable. I'd suggest trying to solve this game on your own, it feels much better then.
Додано 12 березня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
1 людина вважає цю рецензію корисною
6.2 год. загалом (6.1 год на момент рецензування)
Charming artstyle and good animations.
Instant like.
Додано 9 березня.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
1 людина вважає цю рецензію корисною
54.8 год. загалом (39.8 год на момент рецензування)
It's a 7/10, still not better than RE5 which was an 8 and RE4 which was a 10.
Додано 27 лютого.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
1 людина вважає цю рецензію корисною
22.8 год. загалом
My favorite ''''racist'''' video game.
On a more serious note, this game's the 'braindead' sort of fun where you have to NOT think about things too deeply.
Also it has the best appearance of Wesker yet. He's absolutely lovely in this game.
Capcom better remake this game already.
Додано 21 лютого. Востаннє відредаговано 21 лютого.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
1 людина вважає цю рецензію корисною
0.0 год. загалом
What the ♥♥♥♥ Namco.
Додано 18 лютого.
Чи була ця рецензія корисною? Так Ні Кумедна Нагородити
< 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 >
Показані результати 1–10 із 65