Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But when we deconstruct the overall quality of 'chocolatality' (which in clear definition can not even be considered a true 'flavor', rather a muddy diffusion of truffle, sugar and brown wax) it is shown that the childish enjoyment of chocolation is failure of comprehension of true appreciation.
Chocolate is a dim, childish appeal to all the base-tendencies of the tongue, lacking in any real understanding of what makes Great Flavor. Sure, it appeals to the masses; is easy to market. Need any further argument be made? Chocolate=failure.
In point of fact, in the mature spectrum of appreciation, only Pistachio Almond reaches the level of quality that deserves respect from the serious.
But of course it's your choice. Be one more low-brow member of the cocoa herd; or not.