Before we start: why would I recommend this game? because in the end he is very fun thi videogame, like all assassin's creed before him as far as I am concerned.

The first concerns the secondary objectives of the missions, the new way in which sequences and memories are structured is nice, but some objectives simply go beyond the frustrating one. Between a not exactly perfect AI that worsens the gaming experience and objectives as far as possible, the pissed off to try to get 100% synchrony. I stress the frustrating, because certain goals are not absolutely demanding, simply frustrating.

The second concerns the characters. There are a lot, but really a LOT of characters in this game, who enter, give a very slight contribution to say the least in the story and the events, and then disappear, Benjamin Franklin appears only at the beginning and then evaporates, samuel adams DISAPPEARS after a couple of sequences, the same goes for Paul Revere and the like. Then, a character like George Washington, what is his purpose? in history it appears practically rarely and when it does it is a decorative object, an element of decoration.

The third concerns Connor: as a character he is made "well", in the sense that he plays well the role for which he was designed, that is, of a naive and inexperienced boy moved by ideals that often lead him to enter into conflict with those he knows. But one thing bothered me about him: the motor feeling that motivates him to become a murderer and to pursue the Templar threat is not well understood. It is not clear if it is only a desire for revenge towards Charles Lee or a sort of innate understanding of freedom, which never really gives a definition.

Before we start: why would I recommend this game? because in the end he is very fun thi videogame, like all assassin's creed before him as far as I am concerned. The first concerns the secondary objectives of the missions, the new way in which sequences and memories are structured is nice, but some objectives simply go beyond the frustrating one. Between a not exactly perfect AI that worsens the gaming experience and objectives as far as possible, the pissed off to try to get 100% synchrony. I stress the frustrating, because certain goals are not absolutely demanding, simply frustrating. The second concerns the characters. There are a lot, but really a LOT of characters in this game, who enter, give a very slight contribution to say the least in the story and the events, and then disappear, Benjamin Franklin appears only at the beginning and then evaporates, samuel adams DISAPPEARS after a couple of sequences, the same goes for Paul Revere and the like. Then, a character like George Washington, what is his purpose? in history it appears practically rarely and when it does it is a decorative object, an element of decoration. The third concerns Connor: as a character he is made "well", in the sense that he plays well the role for which he was designed, that is, of a naive and inexperienced boy moved by ideals that often lead him to enter into conflict with those he knows. But one thing bothered me about him: the motor feeling that motivates him to become a murderer and to pursue the Templar threat is not well understood. It is not clear if it is only a desire for revenge towards Charles Lee or a sort of innate understanding of freedom, which never really gives a definition.