Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Solar systems are commonly flat discs with planets orbiting a star in one plane, and some planets have one or more moons orbiting them. Isaac Newton did a partial study of this, only sufficient to concluded that the planetary bodies in our solar system have a degree of orbit stability that should maintain their orbits for a long time. But he did not consider other solar system stability issues, and since solar system bodies exert gravitational pulls on each other, the normal structure of a solar system can involve some instabilities, which in the case of our own solar system would chiefly seem to be ;
1. Our spherical Sun with its spherical structure and functioning would be more stable if the planetary gravitational pulls on it were basically distributed spherically. The fact that they are now distributed in one plane only, exerts destabilising pulls on the Sun. Were some planets to orbit the Sun in a plane at 90% to the present plane