目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
推薦
最近兩週 0.0 小時 / 總時數 36.4 小時 (評論時已進行 5.0 小時)
張貼於:2024 年 7 月 17 日 下午 7:26

This is not Shapez and shouldn't compared with Shapez, it's a algebraic monster on its own while Shapez is for combinations, every large number over 50 already need some creative way to figure out the multi step formula for that, e.g. 183 = (8*7+5)*3 without subtraction, also (8*8-3)*3 with subtraction and less resource heavy without 5 and 7 inputs, and it's simple fun overall.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
此評論已停用留言功能。