60
已評論
產品
635
帳戶內
產品

Sir Walrus 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4  5  6 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 60 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 8.7 小時 (評論時已進行 5.5 小時)
Short but sweet. Or ... not sure if sweet or something else, but enjoyable, at least.
張貼於 3 月 6 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 87.3 小時 (評論時已進行 86.7 小時)
Starts out kinda weirdly, introducing a little too much backstory that turns out irrelevant, but it's a fine story beyond the prologue. And Yurika's end gave me all the feels.

Translation could've used some polishing, though. As could the voice volume.
張貼於 3 月 6 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 308.0 小時 (評論時已進行 209.4 小時)
Plenty of exploration for your first run, and plenty of sequence breaks for the second. A quite pleasant combination.

(Could've had a bit more acknowledgement of the sequence breaks, though. At least say something if I beat the final boss with zero crystals.)
張貼於 1 月 6 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 15.7 小時
Cute, but mildly janky.

I like how Letha is not just the generic save-the-world protagonist, but she's got a couple of unheroic traits (my favorite part being the master of the snow land).

On the minus side, the difficulty is all over the place (are you sure level 10 is enough for the monkey beach?), and there's a few glitchy pieces (for example, you can bring Samuel to the academy's master, causing Squalus to not fit in your team).

Would've voted neutral if I could, but.

(Also, Letha should've totally objected to the word half-breed and proposed replacing it with demi-human.)
張貼於 2024 年 12 月 17 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 214.5 小時 (評論時已進行 72.7 小時)
It's RPG Maker. It's got the usual RPG Maker graphics, music, janky staircases, etc.

But there's a surprisingly powerful story behind that, and even the gameplay feels fresh - the bosses have a lot of interesting gimmicks.
張貼於 2024 年 8 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 4.5 小時 (評論時已進行 2.4 小時)
It's pretty janky (the timing-related pieces are just annoying, and I found a few levels where I can take a plant to the next level), but it's pretty charming, and at this price, I have no right to complain.
張貼於 2024 年 5 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 30.5 小時 (評論時已進行 10.1 小時)
The puzzles are as good as the originals - there are even a few new gameplay elements. The story starts slowly and ends a little too quickly, but it's hard to do better - once the original has concluded, there just isn't much left to build a sequel on.
張貼於 2024 年 2 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 0.5 小時 (評論時已進行 0.3 小時)
I have questions about this game. I don't know which questions, but I have them.
張貼於 2023 年 12 月 21 日。 最後編輯於 2023 年 12 月 21 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 22.9 小時
The difficulty is way out of balance. Most of the game is easy, but some pieces (for example the speedways, and the dogs in Toasty's realm) are ridiculously difficult, with almost zero fair challenges in between.

And to make things worse, Gulp's Outlook goes from absurdly difficult to glitched and impossible; the eggs stop spawning halfway through the fight. Googling it reveals it's a well known bug, and has been since two weeks after release.

Unbalanced and broken, and nothing particularly noteworthy on the plus side. All I can do is downvote.
張貼於 2023 年 12 月 17 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 20.4 小時 (評論時已進行 8.0 小時)
Neat game. It's like a mini GBC Zelda.
張貼於 2023 年 12 月 8 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4  5  6 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 60 項