Komentarze
awildgoat 28 grudnia 2014 o 19:38 
np
dry spell on hinge 28 grudnia 2014 o 17:36 
Thanks for the terrible comment on the 4 word muslek story :D
swahce 8 grudnia 2014 o 19:12 
thanks for the terrible chemistry set! :D
Assistant Regional Manager 8 grudnia 2014 o 14:38 
+rep fast smooth trade
Pepzebub 17 listopada 2014 o 12:58 
Thx for pretending that BringVictory was legit, hopefully loads more will fall for it
awildgoat 7 listopada 2014 o 17:38 
yey underscores
AiYaaa 7 listopada 2014 o 16:03 
i heard you liked underscores
AiYaaa 7 listopada 2014 o 16:02 
________________________________________
festivedotgrass 29 października 2014 o 18:19 
Momentum is defined as mass times velocity and is conserved during both elastic and inelastic collisions:
P = M1 * V1 + M2 * V2 = (M1 + M2) * V3 {inelastic} P = M1 * V1 + M2 * V2 = M1 * V1′ + M2 * V2′ (elastic; V1V1′, V2V2′}
Let’s make the following assumptions:
between each floor (to make the math easy) 9.8 meters. [Actual distance was probably 1/3 of that.]
D is distance (between floors) g is gravity [9.8 m/(s2] V0 is initial velocity (V0=0) t is time
D = (1/2) * g * t2 + V0 * t 9.8 m = (1/2) * [9.8 m/(s2] * t2
Solve for t to find out how long it took M1 to free-fall the spacing of one floor into M2.
t=21/2=sqrt(2)=1.414 s
Derivative of acceleration at a point in time is velocity:
V1 = a * t = 9.8 * 1.414 = 13.8 m/s
Thus, before hitting M2, M1 reached a velocity V1=13.8 m/s. M2 is stationary, so its velocity is V2=0. Thus momentum P before impact is:
P = M1 * V1 + M2 * V2 = M1 * V1 (because V2=0)
So girl =gravity*velocity/momentum
Transcendental Loneiro 27 października 2014 o 15:00 
The mathematical laws of gravity break down on a galactic level. In theory, galaxies should fly apart at high velocities based on how far they are from the center of the universe. In reality, they move much less than Newton’s Laws would suggest. The conventional explanation for this oddity is that unobservable dark matter outweighs conventional matter five times over, throwing off many calculations. Unfortunately for this theory, we’ve never actually seen any dark matter—and we can’t, by definition. An alternative theory, MOND, proposes a change to Newton’s laws at low levels of acceleration. The theory states that gravity is not directly proportional to mass, as is usually believed. Instead, it is proportional to mass and a secondary factor, which drops at low levels of gravity. This theory explains the problem of galactic movement without the need for dark matter, but exposes the universal condition: Girl = (Chicken Popcorn^e)/4.32
AiYaaa 27 października 2014 o 14:38 
actually, boy = (videogame + pizza) / ramen * pizza^sprite
awildgoat 27 października 2014 o 13:42 
really, i just redid the calculations and found that
girl=((((baloney^ham)/avocado)-1/pizza^pepsi))/salad)+sqrt(mac n'cheese)^avocado
thus we can conclude that boy=mc^2
AiYaaa 27 października 2014 o 13:29 
i disagree, after careful analysis of the mathematical concepts proven in thereotical mathematics,
girl = 6*pickles^cake + 3
awildgoat 27 października 2014 o 13:17 
oops just errored. girl= lemon juice^tomato
AiYaaa 27 października 2014 o 13:03 
actually girl = carrot*pi
Transcendental Loneiro 27 października 2014 o 8:05 
according to my calculations, Girl= Potato*3
awildgoat 26 października 2014 o 20:12 
your fault: girl=time+money
thus girl=2*money
so girl= 2* sqrt(evil)
unless evil=4 it does not work
i can math
AiYaaa 26 października 2014 o 13:15 
First we say that a girl requires time and money
So, Girl = Time * Money
Then, we say that time is money
Time = Money
So, Girl = Money * Money or Money^2
Then, money is said to be the root of all evil
Money = sqrt(Evil)
Therefore, Girl = (Sqrt(Evil))^2
So, we are forced to conclude that Girl = Evil
AiYaaa 26 października 2014 o 13:13 
+rep I dont even know you
Transcendental Loneiro 27 sierpnia 2014 o 10:19 
+rep fast trader
Zelenkov. 1 sierpnia 2014 o 15:10 
+rep quick and fast trade
festivedotgrass 23 lipca 2014 o 16:22 
+ rep i broke your glasses
lech 27 maja 2014 o 18:37 
+rep fast trader
mirkomick 15 maja 2014 o 13:35 
+rep, very nice trader
awildgoat 12 maja 2014 o 19:29 
Let x be an unknown number.
Then
x=x
2x-x=2x-x
2x-2x=x-x
2(x-x)=1(x-x)
2=1