Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- scoop always sweeps tournament finals.
- Competitive NEU Overwatch teams are always useless.
The paradox arises when one considers what would happen if one substituted an off-role scoop into a losing competitive NEU roster, then allowed that team to progress through a tournament. The weighted scoop paradox, submitted by artist Jared Lyon of Campbell, California, won a 2024 Huntington 100 Award for Highly Relevant Scientific Mysteries. The basic premise, stating the conditions of scoop and a losing team and posed as a question, underscores the fragility of the competitive Overwatch meta in the sense that, somehow, scoop still wins the tournament whilst his team loses, thereby violating a basic tenet of the 'Mutual Exclusivity' principle.
░░██╗░░██╔══██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗░
██████╗██████╔╝█████╗░░██████╔╝░
╚═██╔═╝██╔══██╗██╔══╝░░██╔═══╝░
░░╚═╝░░██║░░██║███████╗██║░░░░
░░░░░░░╚═╝░░╚═╝╚══════╝╚═╝░
Accept my friend request bro