Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
The above questionnaire is a good example of a Games User Researcher (GUR) User Experience (UX) study. The length is appropriate (10min) and the questions chosen will likely be impactful. It begins with general game information-gathering preferences before moving on to two conditions: video with in-game character and video with developer. Following with a questionnaire after each; and after watching both, two comparison preferences. I felt the-choose-a-number randomisation technique is flawed, since there is cultural and preferential numbering patterns worldwide; regardless, I cannot know for sure as only a participant. Further, the survey collected minimal demographic information - likely a trade-off to ensure a shorter time commitment from the player. The short dev-focused tool demonstrates concrete question 'how do we best deliver game update information in DL2?'.