44
已評論
產品
0
帳戶內
產品

cannonInspector 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4  5 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 44 項
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 34.1 小時 (評論時已進行 12.2 小時)
I think of problems and the dev solves them, simple as.
張貼於 2024 年 10 月 20 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
5 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 146.7 小時 (評論時已進行 28.5 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
Why would anyone buy ARK a second time? Wasn't the first time enough? Didn't that game run poorly, already, on Unreal? Why would anyone pay more money for a worse product that they already own? Ask yourself all of these questions before you decide to pay for this game. And in the event your friend buys it for you, shake your head in disappointment.
張貼於 2024 年 8 月 9 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 8.7 小時
Mediocre nu-gen tactical game with thoroughly itemized DLC factions. The game is clearly designed for multiplayer, so anyone playing on their own will have a limited experience. While polished, the gameplay was rarely satisfying and the AI wiggled somewhere between inept and broken.
張貼於 2024 年 5 月 30 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 11.9 小時 (評論時已進行 4.1 小時)
For a game made in 8 months by 5 college students and is free, this is a fantastic game to play with friends. I do not recommend playing it solo, however.
張貼於 2024 年 5 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 1,286.3 小時 (評論時已進行 1,260.2 小時)
Nah
張貼於 2024 年 4 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 0.0 小時
Adds overpowered leaders that are infinitely less interesting than the ones in Endless Space 2.
張貼於 2024 年 4 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 273.2 小時 (評論時已進行 2.6 小時)
I just voted it down to be different.
張貼於 2024 年 2 月 8 日。 最後編輯於 2024 年 5 月 16 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 44.2 小時 (評論時已進行 13.7 小時)
A game exceedingly similar to others in its genre. Sid Meier's Pirates!, Windward, Starsector and Sunless Sea come to mind. You control a team of no more than three ships and explore an admittedly empty, admittedly large stretch of sky called ... something. I don't really remember.

The game doesn't really feel all that fleshed out, but the combat is fun and feels "right". There is an in-game economy but it lacks the depth of Starsector.

I would actually say it's exceedingly similar to Windward but without the constrained, small maps that that game had and with the additional benefit of being able to board enemy ships, as well as customize your own.

For $20, the game feels about as complex and deep as I could expect it to be, however the art style definitely has an uncanny quality and the text is plagued with typographical errors and awkward, stilted grammar that makes it obvious this game was originally written in a language other than English.

My biggest gripe was the soundtrack, hilariously, rather than any game play: It was only ever boring or annoying. It didn't even manage to fade into the background until I turned the volume slider way, way down.

PS: I have literally no idea what the people in this review section are going on about in terms of "They wanted to make an MMO", there's no XP system, levels or anything like that. It's a purely story-based game with a number of voice-acted specialist characters who crew your ship.
張貼於 2024 年 1 月 24 日。 最後編輯於 2024 年 1 月 24 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 89.6 小時 (評論時已進行 81.8 小時)
SYNCHRONIZATION ERROR DETECTED
張貼於 2024 年 1 月 13 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
5 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
3 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 595.5 小時
Don't do it.
張貼於 2023 年 11 月 14 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4  5 >
目前顯示第 1-10 項,共 44 項