Recent reviews by jdb1990

EA have redeemed themselves

This game is actually good

The maps are a bit small, it's still a little too fast, and the menu system sucks

But overall it's a step in the right direction and deserves the name of being a Battlefield game, overall I'm happy

Fantastic game, 30 hours in, loads left, only had 2 crashes, no game breaking bugs, and it runs well (4k/max gives a solid 60+ fps on a 4060) and looks great
The story and humour is good

Only negatives are early combat is brutal and the sneaking missions are too hard

it's great.

Really hard for my PC to run though!

This is a good game.

Don't listen to negative reviews.

Its much better than Outer Worlds. Much better than Starfield.

Really good lore and the graphics are mint and the performance is good. Stable too, only had 2 crashes in 12+ hours.

Good points

* Looks nicer than Civ 6 and runs better

Bad points

* Just not very fun!

---

It just feels like they have been missing the mark ever since Civ 5.

I've been playing Civ since Civ 2 and It just doesn't grab me any more.

The new building, ages, and leader systems are just not good. Really underwhelming when you are victorious too.

The worst DLC for an otherwise good game

Not very fun basically

I like it!

If you want BG3 with warhammer, its spot on

Good mechanics, good soundtrack and voice acting, fun, and looks nice. Plays fine on my 3050/i3 at 1440p/high too. Happy for the money I paid for it.

Has some good aspects but the performance is terrible and the game is boring

Great game, challenging, detailed world, no crashes, performs well, 10/10